Get Adobe Flash player
IntenseMuscle.com
   








Go Back   IntenseMuscle.com > Main Forums > The DOGG Pound > Pound Puppy Forum

Pound Puppy Forum Newbie questions and answers related to DOGGCRAPP concepts and DC training are posted here and threads moved from the Dogg Pound are found here. Ignorance is not a crime in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-25-2015, 05:30 AM   #1
Dranziel
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 34
Widowmaker vs Straight sets

Do you perform a WM set the same way as you perform a SS?

For example, "is it ok" during the WM set to make lets say 12 reps in a row then pause, not racking the weights but just enough for a quick extra breath and then make 3 more reps, pause litte bit 3 more, pause and then make 2 more to reach 20 reps, or do you have to do all reps in a nonstop fashion until you reach technical failure and then stop, as with the SS set?

Or is it up to your self to choose?
Dranziel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 10:42 AM   #2
Michael Travis
Intense Muscle Competitor
 
Michael Travis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 963
I've never been able to get a straight 20 without a few breaths here and there. For me It helps keep the intensity up with a few breaths and also allows you to use more weight than you could if you went for 20 straight. I feel it's personal preference too. Just don't take a prolonged pause and like you said don't rack the weight mid WM
Michael Travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 08:32 PM   #3
ChubChub
Bantamweight Member
 
ChubChub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Essex, Uk
Posts: 111
Widowmaker vs Straight sets

It's kinda like an inverse relationship. If you had a lightish weight on the bar, you'd probably be able to make the 20 reps without a pause. Up the weight on the bar for the sake of progression to tax oneself, and it becomes very difficult to then make it to 20 reps without a pause.
The idea is to manage 20 reps, but fail at roughly 20. Therefore, it should be a difficult set. So for mere mortals, a pause for breath etc... once or twice within the 20 reps would probably be about right.
How you pause is up to you. If I'm squatting, then I'll probably still keep a break in my knee to keep the tension on.....if I can. And I'd be pausing for a second or two. When I fail, I fail. Don't always make 20. I normally try to gauge the weight to try to fail roughly between 15-20 reps.
That'd be my version of it anyway.

Edit:

"I'll probably still keep a break in my knee to keep the tension on."

I've just re-read my post. Probably cobblers......
If the weight is heavy and you're trying to 20 rep, they'll probably be no break in the knee to keep tension on. Maybe just standing huffing and puffing would be more fitting a scenario

Last edited by ChubChub; 04-28-2016 at 04:41 PM.
ChubChub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 01:10 PM   #4
Dranziel
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 34
Ok, thanks guys, then I'm doing it right Because it is very taxing!
Dranziel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 11:13 AM   #5
Keyser_Soze11
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 99
Especially with squat, it is totally fine to "take a break." If you read the original 20 rep squat book, a true 20 repper set or widowmaker should take a couple of minutes. They used to call them "breathing Squats" because that was an integral part of keeping pace and strength throughout the duration. In terms of other movements, the "breaks" should not be as long, as form would most likely break down. A compound movement like back/front squat lends itself well to a windowmaker because one can rest at the top of the movement without it being too taxing if you compare it to a row or bench
Keyser_Soze11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2016, 10:29 AM   #6
Monsun
New Member
 
Monsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 26
20 Rep front squats just don't work for me, since my upper back gives up long before my quads.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Monsun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 12:07 PM   #7
frowsley
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 5
from reading it looks like some people switch from squats to leg press for the widowmaker
frowsley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 02:42 PM   #8
MaxNat
Intense Muscle Competitive Powerlifter 198lb Raw Club Total 1262
 
MaxNat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canton SD
Posts: 390
I believe DC outlined it somewhere that anything you could get injured on, or has a propensity to have your form go to shit with a widowmaker should be avoided (low bar squats, deadlifts, etc). Your better bet would be leg press, hack squat, 45 degree hip sled, etc. I alternate between leg press and hack squat machines for widowmakers. The key is to pick a weight you can normally only do 10 reps with and gut out 20 reps without racking it. Yes, you can stop and hold the weight to catch your breath, but you just can't rack it. The widowmaker is really priming you (filling the muscle FULL of blood) for the immediate extreme stretch (which will then make you cry like a little bitch if you are doing it correctly).
__________________
"It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument." -William G. McAdoo
MaxNat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2016, 09:37 AM   #9
phrozen
Lightweight Member
 
phrozen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dranziel View Post
Do you perform a WM set the same way as you perform a SS?

For example, "is it ok" during the WM set to make lets say 12 reps in a row then pause, not racking the weights but just enough for a quick extra breath and then make 3 more reps, pause litte bit 3 more, pause and then make 2 more to reach 20 reps, or do you have to do all reps in a nonstop fashion until you reach technical failure and then stop, as with the SS set?

Or is it up to your self to choose?
I'd say taking a breather once or twice during a set is fine assuming it isn't a ten second delay lol. Just grind until you can't
phrozen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2017, 07:17 PM   #10
kostasosfp
Bantamweight Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Travis View Post
I've never been able to get a straight 20 without a few breaths here and there. For me It helps keep the intensity up with a few breaths and also allows you to use more weight than you could if you went for 20 straight. I feel it's personal preference too. Just don't take a prolonged pause and like you said don't rack the weight mid WM
i agree with you!
kostasosfp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 07:36 PM   #11
Jsull36
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Travis View Post
I've never been able to get a straight 20 without a few breaths here and there. For me It helps keep the intensity up with a few breaths and also allows you to use more weight than you could if you went for 20 straight. I feel it's personal preference too. Just don't take a prolonged pause and like you said don't rack the weight mid WM
Agreed as well
Jsull36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2018, 07:35 PM   #12
andishehhank
Bantamweight Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: LA
Posts: 104
The way Dante described it in application to the quads was basically take a weight that causes you to fail at 10 reps straight, and then take as many breaths as needed in between reps and go for another 10.

To me it is just another form of rest pause, so to speak. We are just not reracking in between reps on a widowmaker.

Hence, a little different than a true 20 RM where we fail after pumping out 20, without holding the weight in the contracted position and taking breaths.

I also use this when doing my straight sets for forearms. I'll usually grind out at least 5 more reps by holding the weight at the bottom of my reverse and hammer curls and doing one rep at a time.

Last edited by andishehhank; 01-26-2018 at 07:39 PM.
andishehhank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2018, 01:59 PM   #13
MAC_collo
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 24
I do remember reading a post by Dante where he described a slightly different approach to wm's. Starting at a weight where you can complete 30 reps with failure achieved at the last rep. Then every time you repeat the same wm's you add weight and get as many reps as possible. This is then repeated adding weight every time until you finally get down to only getting 10 reps and at that point you lose the wm and move onto another. You wouldn't take any pauses or breaks just push out a straight set.
MAC_collo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2018, 03:21 PM   #14
andishehhank
Bantamweight Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: LA
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_collo View Post
I do remember reading a post by Dante where he described a slightly different approach to wm's. Starting at a weight where you can complete 30 reps with failure achieved at the last rep. Then every time you repeat the same wm's you add weight and get as many reps as possible. This is then repeated adding weight every time until you finally get down to only getting 10 reps and at that point you lose the wm and move onto another. You wouldn't take any pauses or breaks just push out a straight set.
Yeah I think I read this in cycling for pennies about weak body parts.

More or less from following dusty hanshaw I might've thought if this method was used we would strive to (ideally) keep the reps the same (high.)

Also, I thought it was about just 20 rep WMs, but I must've not read as many threads as I thought, then,
andishehhank is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.






Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Indexed by Enginuity